Hi there! You are currently browsing as a guest. Why not create an account? Then you get less ads, can thank creators, post feedback, keep a list of your favourites, and more!
Mad Poster
#376 Old 20th Oct 2010 at 9:45 PM
Quote: Originally posted by mangaroo
We shall probably never know.

The most benign explanation is that SimGuru_Sims (join date 10/10/10 10:10...oooooh) was an authorized account created by the board admins to mop up a potential legal mess and that account somehow got merged with parthiv during today's "board maintenance."

The more entertaining conspiracy theory would be that parthiv was the gifters' source for the hidden URL and he created the SimGuru_Sims account to try to clear a friend's name. What would make the conspiracy more entertaining is if parthiv no longer worked for EA and he was actually hacking the site to do these things. (But that begs the question of why the parthiv account would still exist.)

** This is a work of fiction. Any resemblance to SimGurus living or dead is merely coincidental. No official forum members were harmed during production.


Great theory!
Advertisement
Forum Resident
#377 Old 20th Oct 2010 at 9:48 PM
As far as conspiracies go, that was pretty much what I was thinking. Site maintenance shouldn't have messed things up as badly as they did this morning. Frankly, I think someone stuck their hand in where it didn't belong, and since most corporate espionage is done by insiders it's not too far off to be assuming all that, whether it's right or wrong. And it may very well be wrong.

My cat taught me how to fetch. I throw the toy, she shows me where it landed, and I fetch it.
Banned
#378 Old 20th Oct 2010 at 10:58 PM
Quote: Originally posted by mangaroo
They don't. In fact, they would probably expose themselves to liability issues if they publicized the names of banned accounts and the reason for the ban.


This is how corporate types tend think, even if the risk is really minimal. After all, truth is a defense to defamation.

Also, most account names go under a handle, so users are largely anonymous. It's really hard to defame an anonymous individual. To bring suit, they would have to disclose their real name and give all sorts of information they might not want to give.

In fact, it might be an effective way of smoking them out. Make all sorts of accusations, and if the thieves file a lawsuit, EA knows who they are!

(Police agencies and a computer company probably have effective methods of tracking down the thieves. In fact, EA may very well have let them access the page with the intent of tracking them. Only a fool hacks into the website of a computer company!)
Mad Poster
#379 Old 20th Oct 2010 at 11:43 PM
Quote: Originally posted by mangaroo
(Honestly, I don't understand why anyone would choose to participate in the official forums. Their moderation seems arbitrary and without appeal, and the forums themselves aren't optimized for building a sense of community. If you want to send a private message to someone, you apparently have to send a gift from the store and include your message in the note field.)


I log on the official forums to correct the wrong information being spread on it. For example, someone wants to know if there's a mod to add more lot sizes to the world editor, and I respond telling them about Inge's mod. Give the link and the page where CTNutmegger's directions on how to tune the XML. Next response, a long time poster going around telling that mods are bad for your computer and may destroy it.

Since this person have thousands of posts, the chilluns believe her and chime in, "Oh yeah, she knows what is up on mods, because she has been around for a long time." I am thoroughly entertained by the response, laughing til I cry. Then I cry for those with little mod knowledge, cause they will never enjoy the game to the fullest.

Aha! So that is why there is a gifting system. Now it makes sense, capitalism at its best.

Resident member of The Receptacle Refugees
Let's help fund mammograms for everyone. If you want to help, Click To Give @ The Breast Cancer Site Your click is free. Thank you.
One horse disagreer of the Apocalypse
#380 Old 21st Oct 2010 at 9:31 AM
Mods are also offensive to Wiccans.

"You can do refraction by raymarching through the depth buffer" (c. Reddeyfish 2017)
Alchemist
#381 Old 21st Oct 2010 at 12:30 PM
Quote: Originally posted by lewisb40
I log on the official forums to correct the wrong information being spread on it.
I've been pretty amazed at the level of ignorance regarding modding the game that exists at the official site...it's good that at least one person is trying to help out over there

Quote: Originally posted by lewisb40
Next response, a long time poster going around telling that mods are bad for your computer and may destroy it. I am thoroughly entertained by the response, laughing til I cry.
Funny...then again, I have to wonder if one of this person's main experiences with "mods" wasn't that bizarre TSR doll-virus...lol. For people who don't get much beyond the official site that thing probably reinforced every scary thing they've ever heard about mods from off-site.
Eminence Grise
#382 Old 21st Oct 2010 at 3:57 PM
There's a pervasive view on the EA forums that you can get infected with a virus or other malware from ads on the TSR site. I don't know if that's true or not, having no reason to go there. Seems unlikely, since it's not exactly good business to do that
world renowned whogivesafuckologist
retired moderator
#383 Old 21st Oct 2010 at 4:07 PM
Well, sometimes ads get hijacked by malware/adware, so that they'll display different ads than usual and those ads may contain MORE malware/adware that your antivirus reacts to. It's happened here too - someone will report a particular ad makes their antivirus go crazy, and it turns out they're already infected with something their antivirus didn't catch.

my simblr (sometimes nsfw)

“Dude, suckin’ at something is the first step to being sorta good at something.”
Panquecas, panquecas e mais panquecas.
Mad Poster
#384 Old 21st Oct 2010 at 4:07 PM
If you don't have a subscription, going on the site will make my Norton's have a hissy fit. There are many ads on a free log on, but Norton picks up on tracking cookies. I guess those that experience virus or any other problems may not have a virus protection program, or one that doesn't work well on TSR's ads. Just IMHO.


Ninja'd by HP.

Resident member of The Receptacle Refugees
Let's help fund mammograms for everyone. If you want to help, Click To Give @ The Breast Cancer Site Your click is free. Thank you.
Top Secret Researcher
#385 Old 21st Oct 2010 at 6:18 PM
I don't have any problems with TSR or their ads. I actually have more issues with the ones on this site since they sometimes get stuck and I can't close them to click on the MTS menu..plus they are noisy and if I forget to turn off the sound at 1 am they can wake up my kids. I have never gotten a virus from TSR either..and its not just the Official Forums that spread this rumor. I am not defending TSR, just responding to the rumor.
Lab Assistant
#386 Old 21st Oct 2010 at 10:05 PM
Sorry HP! I forgot.....

I've never experienced anything negative with the ads on TSR either. My Avast doesn't react to it at all. The Sims 3 site acts weird for me though. It loads three times more slowly than any other site I go to, so I don't go there unless there's some new freebees to download. I'm actually kinda glad I'm not there often, now with all the weirdness is going on. As for mods, I really don't go any further than MTS and XM Sims, because whenever I try to download stuff form any other sites, I tend to come across problems.
Scholar
#387 Old 21st Oct 2010 at 10:37 PM
Quote: Originally posted by Inge Jones
Mods are also offensive to Wiccans.


Really? I thought they were created by Wiccans...and Warlocks...and fairies...and alchemists...and pretty much anyone with magical abilities.

It's Life...there are no rules.
You can see more of my creations at www.customsims3.com
Inventor
#388 Old 22nd Oct 2010 at 10:08 PM
So all the conspiracy theories are quite true.

SimGuru Hydra posted this in the official forum:

Quote:
Hi all,

We discovered that there were forum admininstrative accounts that were maliciously used to impersonate EA employees and were used to delete many important, helpful, and fun threads on the forums. We tried very hard to recover the deleted threads, but unfortunately, they are unable to be recovered.

Please know that we are very upset that the stickies and threads many of you have put a lot of your hard work in have been deleted by this malicious activity. But we encourage you to start new ones and we will help create indexes as we did before.

We apologize for this inconvenience.
Test Subject
#389 Old 22nd Oct 2010 at 10:27 PM
I just saw that too.

I think it's about time EA does something about these losers. It's been going on for way too long now.

sounds to me like it was Alexurt herself, or one of her buddies that hacked the forums.

Sorry to say, but when is EA going to press charges??? I don't agree with a lot of the things they do either, but this stuff is getting ridiculous. I mean, first theft, now hacking into a major corp.'s website???? A bunch of innocent people's threads were deleted because of this, so whomever did it must've had a bone to pick with these people as well. ??
Inventor
#390 Old 22nd Oct 2010 at 10:42 PM
Okay, it doesn't necessarily mean that because they did one thing, they did another.

Honestly, I think that EA steals from us by removing a chunk of content from every game, then selling it to us piecemeal. Its why I stopped buying -all- EA products after sims 3. No more rockband, as sad as it makes me not to have it anymore [sold the 360 and all the 360 games]. The fact that the whole digital media business allows the corporations to mistreat their customers.

And going back along the thread a bit, having had my WoW account stolen and used for gold selling, and having had a very good experience with Blizzard, comparing them and EA is like comparing an magical golden apple with a nasty one filled with worms - no real comparison. Only issue with Blizzard is getting -through- to someone.

Meanwhile, EA has tempbanned me for asking 'uncomfortable' questions on the sims 2 forums, so yeah....wonderful technical support there.

Reyn Silversong-Sim Architect

Terms of Use-All of my stuff is available for use anywhere that is free. All I ask is credit and a link back to the objects in question, or the house they are featured with. DO NOT POST ON THE EXCHANGE!
Test Subject
#391 Old 22nd Oct 2010 at 10:59 PM
Quote: Originally posted by Reyn
Okay, it doesn't necessarily mean that because they did one thing, they did another.


True. Good point. (wouldn't let me post this if it's less than 7 characters? Really?? How weird.)
Mad Poster
#392 Old 23rd Oct 2010 at 2:45 AM
Quote: Originally posted by crinrict
So all the conspiracy theories are quite true.

SimGuru Hydra posted this in the official forum:
How do we know that was really from SimGuru Hydra? (Just kidding.)
Field Researcher
#393 Old 23rd Oct 2010 at 3:56 AM
Quote: Originally posted by RoseCity
How do we know that was really from SimGuru Hydra? (Just kidding.)


Honestly, I´m thinking the same thing... Anyway, I´m lost in all this mess... Suspicious free simpoints page, false heroes, forum drama and now we learn about compromissed administrative EA accounts, assuming that post is even true?
Alchemist
#394 Old 23rd Oct 2010 at 10:59 AM
Quote:
SimGuru Hydra posted this in the official forum:

Quote:
Hi all,

We discovered that there were forum admininstrative accounts that were maliciously used to impersonate EA employees and were used to delete many important, helpful, and fun threads on the forums. We tried very hard to recover the deleted threads, but unfortunately, they are unable to be recovered..."
If SimGuru Hydra's statement really represents EA's position on this can we assume that the administrative accounts were maliciously used by outsiders and not merely highjacked by other EA employees on a spree?...or even that forum administrators didn't do the damage for some reason of their own? Can we assume the powers that be at EA would be aware of it if their own employees were manipulating the forums this way? Perhaps not.

IMO the whole thing just goes to show that a large corporation can't run a Sims forum any more effectively than anyone else...and not as well as many others do. Certainly they've demonstrated twice now they don't even protect their pages very well.
1978 gallons of pancake batter
#395 Old 23rd Oct 2010 at 12:32 PM
Quote: Originally posted by Inge Jones
There does seem to be this attitude around that one is not responsible for one's own dishonesty - it's the fault of the owner for failing to keep you out effectively enough. This makes it seem like we're mindless automatons, programmed to selfishly acquire whenever physically able to do so.{...}
I consider "fault" a terribly inadequate term. It implies a one-dimensional cause and divides the involved parties in delinquents and innocents/victims. The problem with such labels is that you can't talk about what they might have done right or wrong anymore, and talking about a "victim's" wrongdoings/failures will get you labelled as delinquent, too.

And: A group of a certain amount of individuals won't show individual reason anymore. It's just a mob and its actors are only driven by basic instinct.

Quote: Originally posted by orangemittens
IMO the whole thing just goes to show that a large corporation can't run a Sims forum any more effectively than anyone else...and not as well as many others do. Certainly they've demonstrated twice now they don't even protect their pages very well.
They've demonstrated that they've got incompitance vermin. Lots of it.

If gotcha is all you’ve got, then you’ve got nothing. - Paul Krugman
Lab Assistant
#396 Old 23rd Oct 2010 at 2:43 PM
Quote: Originally posted by Reyn
Honestly, I think that EA steals from us by removing a chunk of content from every game, then selling it to us piecemeal.


Bashing the big bad corporations seems to be a commonality for the 21 Century. Perhaps we should all just quit playing the game...that'll fix everything. That'll bring back the hundreds of dollars that I've spent on the Sims and the thousands of dollars that I've spent on computers to play the Sims. And I'll get back the last ten years that I've obviously wasted playing a game that was designed from the very beginning to pilfer my pockets. Shame on them for preying on my lack of willpower to shun their drug.

How on Earth am I going to hold on until Tuesday...I need my FIX.
Alchemist
#397 Old 23rd Oct 2010 at 5:24 PM
Quote: Originally posted by Buzzler
They've demonstrated that they've got incompitance vermin. Lots of it.
Lol...agreed...they've proven that over and over in a myriad of ways.

Quote: Originally posted by DaBoogadie
Bashing the big bad corporations seems to be a commonality for the 21 Century.
People always bash the powers that be...corporations have stepped into that role more pervasively over time so they're gonna get a bashing Personally rather than quit because EA is selling content "piecemeal" I'd rather just make my own and download what other players have made...I like it better than most EA stuff anyway.
Alchemist
#398 Old 24th Oct 2010 at 12:02 AM
Quote: Originally posted by DaBoogadie
Bashing the big bad corporations seems to be a commonality for the 21 Century.



are they not worthy of bashing?

"The more you know, the sadder you get."~ Stephen Colbert
"I'm not going to censor myself to comfort your ignorance." ~ Jon Stewart
Versigtig, ek's nog steeds fokken giftig
Lab Assistant
#399 Old 24th Oct 2010 at 1:42 AM
Quote: Originally posted by SuicidiaParasidia
are they not worthy of bashing?


Sometimes, but not by people who only buy the base game and then complain about every EP & Sp that comes out. If you want the whole game, then you have to buy the whole game. That hasn't changed in the history of the franchise.
Forum Resident
#400 Old 24th Oct 2010 at 4:33 AM
Quote: Originally posted by DaBoogadie
If you want the whole game, then you have to buy the whole game. That hasn't changed in the history of the franchise.

And yet your previous comment on the bash-worthiness of corporations was in reply to a complaint that we would have to buy things piece-by-piece from the Store because EA didn't want to sell us the whole game in just one go. And that would be a change for the franchise.
Page 16 of 17
Back to top